¿Es el signo de Hawkins capaz de predecir la necrosis en las fracturas del cuello astragalino? / Is the Hawkins sign able to predict necrosis in fractures of the neck of the astragalus?

Objetivo. Determinar si el signo de Hawkins predice que el astrágalo fracturado a nivel del cuello desarrollará o no una necrosis avascular (NAV), y determinar la relación con el desplazamiento de la fractura, la lesión de partes blandas, o la demora en la reducción o en la cirugía. Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de 23 fracturas de cuello de astrágalo recogidas durante 13 años. Se recogen las siguientes variables: desplazamiento de la fractura, lesión de partes blandas, demora y tipo de tratamiento, complicaciones, observación del signo de Hawkins y resultado funcional. Resultados. Se registraron 7 fracturas Hawkins tipo I , 11 tipo II , 4 tipo III y una tipo IV . Cuatro casos desarrollaron una NAV (2 Hawkins tipo II y 2 tipo III ). Se observó el signo de Hawkins en 12 casos, de los cuales ninguno desarrolló necrosis. Cuatro casos con signo de Hawkins negativo desarrollaron necrosis. No se hallaron diferencias al comparar el desarrollo de NAV con el desplazamiento de la fractura, la lesión de partes blandas o la demora en el tratamiento. Sí se hallaron diferencias al comparar el desarrollo de NAV con la observación del signo de Hawkins (p = 0,03). Conclusión. El signo de Hawkins positivo descarta que el astrágalo fracturado desarrolle una NAV, pero su ausencia no lo confirma (AU)

Introduction: The most common cause of osteoarthritis of the ankle is post-traumatic, and although tibiotalar arthrodesis remains the surgical gold standard, a number of techniques have been described to preserve joint mobility, such as joint distraction arthroplasty or arthrodiastasis. Objective: To evaluate the functional outcome and changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain after the application of the distraction arthroplasty for post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Patients and methods: A prospective comparative study of a group of 10 young patients with post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis treated by synovectomy and arthrodiastasis, compared to a control group of 10 patients treated by isolated synovectomy. Results were calculated using the AOFAS scale and the VAS for pain before and after treatment. Results: As regards the pain measured by VAS, no difference was observed between the two groups before surgery (P=.99), but there was a difference at 3 months (P<.001), 6 months (P=.005), and 12 months (P=.006). No differences were observed in the AOFAS scale between the two groups before surgery (P=.99), or at 3 months (P<.99), but there was a difference at 6 months (P<.001). Conclusions: Ankle arthrodiastasis is effective in reducing pain in post-traumatic ankle arthropathy, and is superior to isolated synovectomy (AU)

[Is the Hawkins sign able to predict necrosis in fractures of the neck of the astragalus?]. / ¿Es el signo de Hawkins capaz de predecir la necrosis en las fracturas del cuello astragalino?

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the Hawkins sign can predict whether or not astragalus fractures of the neck will develop avascular necrosis. It is also assessed whether the occurrence of this complication is related to the displacement of the fracture, soft tissue injury, or delay in the reduction or surgery. The results were compared with those found in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 23 talar neck fractures recorded over a a period of thirteen years. The following variables were analysed: displacement of the fracture, soft tissue injury, delay and type of treatment, complications, observation of the Hawkins sign, and functional outcome. RESULTS: There were 7 type I Hawkins fractures, 11 type II, and 4 type III and 1 type IV. Four cases developed avascular necrosis (2 Hawkins type II and 2 type III). Hawkins sign was observed in 12 cases, of which none developed necrosis. Four cases with negative Hawkins sign developed necrosis. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the development of avascular necrosis with the displacement of the fracture, soft tissue injury, or delay in treatment. Differences were found when comparing the development of avascular necrosis with the Hawkins sign (P=.03). CONCLUSION: A positive Hawkins sign rules out that the fractured talus has developed avascular necrosis, but its absence does not confirm it.